DxO develops lab-tested profiles for its supported cameras and lenses, resulting in the best corrections and most detailed RAW images we've seen.ĭxO's processing approach combines RAW demosaicing and noise reduction processes into a single, simultaneous step thanks to its AI-powered DxO DeepPRIME technology, and the results are outstanding. PhotoLab 5 separates itself from Lightroom through DxO's fantastic RAW processing tools and optical corrections. Starting with PhotoLab, DxO PhotoLab 5 is DxO's alternative to Lightroom.
#TOPAZ VS DXO SOFTWARE#
This is the first of three straight sections covering DxO software solutions.
#TOPAZ VS DXO FREE#
Free trial: Yes, 30 days and no credit card required. Subscriptions cost $24/month or $179/year with all available updates if you're subscribed.
#TOPAZ VS DXO HOW TO#
It may take you a while to learn how to take full advantage of Capture One, but once you do, it'll be hard to imagine using anything else for most of your photo editing needs.įor some tasks, you still need another app or two in your workflowīuying options: Lifetime license is $299 with free updates until the next major release comes out. It's also a popular choice for many pros, so there are educational resources aplenty.Ĭapture One may not be a full replacement for every feature offered by Lightroom and Photoshop, but Capture One offers much of the best of both while delivering fantastic image processing technology and editing tools. That said, Capture One has stepped up its educational content over the last few years, and there are many fantastic tutorials available directly through the app to help new users learn all about the software and its capabilities. If you're a more advanced photographer looking to get the most out of your RAW image files and edit color with even better fidelity, then Capture One 22 is well worth checking out.Ĭapture One 22 is a bit more sophisticated and thus a bit harder to learn than Adobe Lightroom. Just because Adobe Lightroom is the most popular organizational and editing app doesn't mean that it's the best at everything. Free trial: Yes, 7 days and requires billing information. Lightroom, while faster than ever, can still feel a bit sluggishīuying options: Subscription only with plans starting at $9.99 per month. Useful amount of cloud storage costs extra Reasons to avoid Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom Photoshop has excellent non-destructive editing and layers Lightroom offers easy editing and powerful organization Good RAW processing with a lot of camera and lens support Yes my process sounds nuts - uses lots of storage and processing power - but it works for me.Reasons to use Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom but take care to avoid the Enhancement tools - particularly face enhancement - unless you are into cartoons.įor very special stuff - I use layers in PS to paint in and localise various copies of the same image - but as a rule when processing large numbers of images - NOPE it is too much work.
Sometimes I will use Sharpen AI as an alternative when I want to be very precise in the sharpening and where it is applied I find Photo AI an overly blunt instrument - but it has improved a lot since the original free release.
BUT - I do not use LRC's sharpening or noise reduction - I find on most occasions that Topaz DeNoise AI give me what I want (noise reduction and basically simple sharpening). So I still import all files from the cards/cameras then apply the PR3 plugin to process the RAW conversion AND then finish my edits in LRC with PS and other tools as needed. LRC and PS (with ACR) has great tools and very time saving masking and local adjustment tools - PS is now crazy deep. ACR/LRC treats these files very similarly to RAW files but the work PR3 has done is in them (not the same with other types of PNG file) So I use PR3 to process my select raw files and generate a Linear PNG file. WHY - since day one to today while Adobe ACR/LRC was the first software to "permit" processing of Z9 Lossless RAW files - the results have looked "lousy" to me - I much prefer what Capture One and then Pure Raw did to these files.
#TOPAZ VS DXO MAC#
I take all the Z9 Lossless RAW files I want to use through the Deep Prime or DeepPrime XD - I am yet to see the real difference but XD runs almost as fast on my Mac Studio as Deep Prime - so I have been using XD recently.
I do not use any Topaz AI tool for RAW conversion. I apply PR3 towards the start of my process and the Topaz AI tools as needed at the end. For me Topaz AI plugins and DxO Raw 3 (PR3) perform entirely separate roles.
0 kommentar(er)
